Skip to main content
Home

Search form

  • Home
  • Calendar
  • People
    • Key Personnel
    • Members
    • Collaborators
  • Grants
  • Papers
  • Blogs
  • Wiki
  • Log In
Home / Effects of working memory demand on neural mechanisms of motor response selection and control.

Effects of working memory demand on neural mechanisms of motor response selection and control.

TitleEffects of working memory demand on neural mechanisms of motor response selection and control.
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2013
AuthorsBarber AD, Caffo BS, Pekar JJ, Mostofsky SH
JournalJ Cogn Neurosci
Volume25
Issue8
Pagination1235-48
Date Published2013 Aug
ISSN1530-8898
KeywordsAdult, Brain, brain mapping, Choice Behavior, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Inhibition (Psychology), Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Motor Activity, Neuropsychological Tests, Oxygen, Reaction Time, Young Adult
Abstract

Inhibitory control commonly recruits a number of frontal regions: pre-supplementary motor area (pre-SMA), frontal eye fields (FEFs), and right-lateralized posterior inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), dorsal anterior insula (DAI), dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), and inferior frontal junction (IFJ). These regions may directly implement inhibitory motor control or may be more generally involved in executive control functions. Two go/no-go tasks were used to distinguish regions specifically recruited for inhibition from those that additionally show increased activity with working memory demand. The pre-SMA and IFG were recruited for inhibition in both tasks and did not have greater activation for working memory demand on no-go trials, consistent with a role in inhibitory control. Activation in pre-SMA also responded to response selection demand and was increased with working memory on go trials specifically. The bilateral FEF and right DAI were commonly active for no-go trials. The FEF was also recruited to a greater degree with working memory demand on go trials and may bias top-down information when stimulus-response mappings change. The DAI, additionally responded to increased working memory demand on both go and no-go trials and may be involved in accessing sustained task information, alerting, or autonomic changes when cognitive demands increase. DLPFC activation was consistent with a role in working memory retrieval on both go and no-go trials. The inferior frontal junction, on the other hand, had greater activation with working memory specifically for no-go trials and may detect salient stimuli when the task requires frequent updating of working memory representations.

DOI10.1162/jocn_a_00394
Alternate JournalJ Cogn Neurosci
PubMed ID23530923
PubMed Central IDPMC3743681
Grant ListR01 MH085328 / MH / NIMH NIH HHS / United States
R01 NS047781 / NS / NINDS NIH HHS / United States
  • Google Scholar
  • BibTeX

Navigation

  • Statistical methods
    • General
    • Causal Inference
    • Population ICA
    • PVD
    • Testing
    • Prediction / Machine Learning
    • Computation
    • Visualization
    • Structural PCA
  • Scientific areas of interest
    • Brain imaging - Variability
    • Brain Imaging - Prediction
    • Brain Imaging - Clinical
    • Wearable Computing
    • Biosignals
  • Software & Tutorials
  • Social media
  • Logos
© 2012 smart-stats.org