@article {804, title = {Normalization and extraction of interpretable metrics from raw accelerometry data.}, journal = {Biostatistics}, volume = {15}, year = {2014}, month = {2014 Jan}, pages = {102-16}, abstract = {

We introduce an explicit set of metrics for human activity based on high-density acceleration recordings from a hip-worn tri-axial accelerometer. These metrics are based on two concepts: (i) Time Active, a measure of the length of time when activity is distinguishable from rest and (ii) AI, a measure of the relative amplitude of activity relative to rest. All measurements are normalized (have the same interpretation across subjects and days), easy to explain and implement, and reproducible across platforms and software implementations. Metrics were validated by visual inspection of results and quantitative in-lab replication studies, and by an association study with health outcomes.

}, keywords = {Acceleration, Aged, Baltimore, Cohort Studies, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Female, Humans, Male, Motor Activity}, issn = {1468-4357}, doi = {10.1093/biostatistics/kxt029}, author = {Bai, Jiawei and He, Bing and Shou, Haochang and Zipunnikov, Vadim and Glass, Thomas A and Crainiceanu, Ciprian M} } @article {810, title = {Combining hidden Markov models for comparing the dynamics of multiple sleep electroencephalograms.}, journal = {Stat Med}, volume = {32}, year = {2013}, month = {2013 Aug 30}, pages = {3342-56}, abstract = {

In this manuscript, we consider methods for the analysis of populations of electroencephalogram signals during sleep for the study of sleep disorders using hidden Markov models (HMMs). Notably, we propose an easily implemented method for simultaneously modeling multiple time series that involve large amounts of data. We apply these methods to study sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) in the Sleep Heart Health Study (SHHS), a landmark study of SDB and cardiovascular consequences. We use the entire, longitudinally collected, SHHS cohort to develop HMM population parameters, which we then apply to obtain subject-specific Markovian predictions. From these predictions, we create several indices of interest, such as transition frequencies between latent states. Our HMM analysis of electroencephalogram signals uncovers interesting findings regarding differences in brain activity during sleep between those with and without SDB. These findings include stability of the percent time spent in HMM latent states across matched diseased and non-diseased groups and differences in the rate of transitioning.

}, keywords = {Data Interpretation, Statistical, Electroencephalography, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Markov Chains, Middle Aged, Models, Statistical, Sleep Apnea Syndromes}, issn = {1097-0258}, doi = {10.1002/sim.5747}, author = {Langrock, Roland and Swihart, Bruce J and Caffo, Brian S and Punjabi, Naresh M and Crainiceanu, Ciprian M} } @article {824, title = {A decision-theory approach to interpretable set analysis for high-dimensional data.}, journal = {Biometrics}, volume = {69}, year = {2013}, month = {2013 Sep}, pages = {614-23}, abstract = {

A key problem in high-dimensional significance analysis is to find pre-defined sets that show enrichment for a statistical signal of interest; the classic example is the enrichment of gene sets for differentially expressed genes. Here, we propose a new decision-theory approach to the analysis of gene sets which focuses on estimating the fraction of non-null variables in a set. We introduce the idea of "atoms," non-overlapping sets based on the original pre-defined set annotations. Our approach focuses on finding the union of atoms that minimizes a weighted average of the number of false discoveries and missed discoveries. We introduce a new false discovery rate for sets, called the atomic false discovery rate (afdr), and prove that the optimal estimator in our decision-theory framework is to threshold the afdr. These results provide a coherent and interpretable framework for the analysis of sets that addresses the key issues of overlapping annotations and difficulty in interpreting p values in both competitive and self-contained tests. We illustrate our method and compare it to a popular existing method using simulated examples, as well as gene-set and brain ROI data analyses.

}, keywords = {Algorithms, Bayes Theorem, Biometry, Brain, Computer Simulation, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Decision Theory, Functional Neuroimaging, Gene Expression Profiling, Genomics, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Models, Statistical, Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis}, issn = {1541-0420}, doi = {10.1111/biom.12060}, author = {Boca, Simina M and Bravo, H{\'e}ctor C{\'e}orrada and Caffo, Brian and Leek, Jeffrey T and Parmigiani, Giovanni} } @article {847, title = {Everything you never wanted to know about circular analysis, but were afraid to ask.}, journal = {J Cereb Blood Flow Metab}, volume = {30}, year = {2010}, month = {2010 Sep}, pages = {1551-7}, abstract = {

Over the past year, a heated discussion about {\textquoteright}circular{\textquoteright} or {\textquoteright}nonindependent{\textquoteright} analysis in brain imaging has emerged in the literature. An analysis is circular (or nonindependent) if it is based on data that were selected for showing the effect of interest or a related effect. The authors of this paper are researchers who have contributed to the discussion and span a range of viewpoints. To clarify points of agreement and disagreement in the community, we collaboratively assembled a series of questions on circularity herein, to which we provide our individual current answers in }, keywords = {Brain, brain mapping, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Guidelines as Topic, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Neurosciences, Publications, Research Design, Selection Bias}, issn = {1559-7016}, doi = {10.1038/jcbfm.2010.86}, author = {Kriegeskorte, Nikolaus and Lindquist, Martin A and Nichols, Thomas E and Poldrack, Russell A and Vul, Edward} }