@article {805, title = {Practical recommendations for population PK studies with sampling time errors.}, journal = {Eur J Clin Pharmacol}, volume = {69}, year = {2013}, month = {2013 Dec}, pages = {2055-64}, abstract = {

PURPOSE: Population pharmacokinetic (PK) data collected from routine clinical practice offers a rich source of valuable information. However, in observational population PK data, accurate time information for blood samples is often missing, resulting in measurement errors (ME) in the sampling time variable. The goal of this study was to investigate the effects on model parameters when a scheduled time is used instead of the actual blood sampling time, and to propose ME correction methods.

METHODS: Simulation studies were conducted based on two major factors: the curvature in PK profiles and the size of ME. As ME correction methods, transform both sides (TBS) models were developed with application of Box-Cox power transformation and Taylor expansion. The TBS models were compared to a conventional population PK model using simulations.

RESULTS: The most important determinant of bias due to time ME was the degree of curvature (nonlinearity) in PK profiles; the smaller the curvature around sampling times, the smaller the associated bias. The second important determinant was the magnitude of ME; the larger the ME, the larger the bias. The proposed TBS models performed better than a conventional population PK modeling when curvature and ME were substantial.

CONCLUSIONS: Time ME in sampling time can lead to bias on the parameter estimators. The following practical recommendations are provided: 1) when the curvature of PK profiles is small, conventional population PK modeling is robust to even large ME; and 2) when the curvature is moderate or large, the proposed methodology reduces bias in parameter estimates.

}, keywords = {Humans, Models, Biological, Pharmacokinetics, Research Design, Time Factors}, issn = {1432-1041}, doi = {10.1007/s00228-013-1576-7}, author = {Choi, Leena and Crainiceanu, Ciprian M and Caffo, Brian S} } @article {803, title = {Quantifying the reliability of image replication studies: the image intraclass correlation coefficient (I2C2).}, journal = {Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci}, volume = {13}, year = {2013}, month = {2013 Dec}, pages = {714-24}, abstract = {

This article proposes the image intraclass correlation (I2C2) coefficient as a global measure of reliability for imaging studies. The I2C2 generalizes the classic intraclass correlation (ICC) coefficient to the case when the data of interest are images, thereby providing a measure that is both intuitive and convenient. Drawing a connection with classical measurement error models for replication experiments, the I2C2 can be computed quickly, even in high-dimensional imaging studies. A nonparametric bootstrap procedure is introduced to quantify the variability of the I2C2 estimator. Furthermore, a Monte Carlo permutation is utilized to test reproducibility versus a zero I2C2, representing complete lack of reproducibility. Methodologies are applied to three replication studies arising from different brain imaging modalities and settings: regional analysis of volumes in normalized space imaging for characterizing brain morphology, seed-voxel brain activation maps based on resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), and fractional anisotropy in an area surrounding the corpus callosum via diffusion tensor imaging. Notably, resting-state fMRI brain activation maps are found to have low reliability, ranging from .2 to .4. Software and data are available to provide easy access to the proposed methods.

}, keywords = {Adult, Brain, brain mapping, Computer Simulation, Female, Humans, Male, Models, Biological, Neuroimaging, Reproducibility of Results, Statistics as Topic}, issn = {1531-135X}, doi = {10.3758/s13415-013-0196-0}, author = {Shou, H and Eloyan, A and Lee, S and Zipunnikov, V and Crainiceanu, A N and Nebel, N B and Caffo, B and Lindquist, M A and Crainiceanu, C M} }